On 18 nov 2005, at 17.13, Randy Bush wrote:
RIPE NCC is known to be very reasonable towards transit networks, and I could bet good money you could get an allocation without a hitch. So what you say is "keep the current rule as the NCC will disobey it anyway". Why can't we just fix the broken policy.... how much should policy be twisted to cover up broken/incomplete technology? the need will be continual and infinite.
RIPE NCC is known to be very reasonable towards transit networks, and I could bet good money you could get an allocation without a hitch. So what you say is "keep the current rule as the NCC will disobey it anyway". Why can't we just fix the broken policy....
RIPE NCC is known to be very reasonable towards transit networks, and I could bet good money you could get an allocation without a hitch.
So what you say is "keep the current rule as the NCC will disobey it anyway". Why can't we just fix the broken policy....
how much should policy be twisted to cover up broken/incomplete technology? the need will be continual and infinite.
You know Randy, you don't HAVE to do v6. You can stay at v4...:-) - kurtis -
Replies
Message References
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
