Re: [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
-
To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <>
-
From: Randy Bush <>
-
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:13:17 -0800
>> RIPE NCC is known to be very reasonable towards transit networks,
>> and I could bet good money you could get an allocation without a
>> hitch.
> So what you say is "keep the current rule as the NCC will disobey it
> anyway". Why can't we just fix the broken policy....
how much should policy be twisted to cover up broken/incomplete
technology? the need will be continual and infinite.
randy
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
