Re: [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6

[Pekka Savola <]

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Tim Streater wrote:
> The other network is one we are *currently* managing, EUMEDCONNECT. 
> It is for the Middle-eastern and North African NRENs. The intention 
> here is that we expect these NRENs to set up their own entity to 
> manage it, and go their own way, in which case we gift them the 
> infrastructure, which in this case has to include the address space. 
> We can do that for v4 as I got PI space for that. Its v6 that is the 
> problem.
Did you actually *try* getting a separate /32 for this?

RIPE NCC is known to be very reasonable towards transit networks, and 
I could bet good money you could get an allocation without a hitch.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings