Re: [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6

[Tim Streater <]

At 16:15 17/11/2005, Marc van Selm wrote:

[NATO scenario]

>I can't help feeling this rule is written for ISPs but will be counter 
>productive for NATO and organisations with a very large privately operated 
>enterprice network. I also can't help the feeling that its a paper tiger. So 
>isn't there another way to achieve the same result as this rule was intended 
>for?
>
>Any views?


It should go. We manage a transit network connecting Middle-eastern and North African national research networks (NRENs). The aim is that this grouping go independent of us at some point and manage everything themselves. I was able to get v4 PI space for this from RIPE, but the 200 rule appears to rule out these guys using v6. Oh well. 

-- Tim