|
|
 |
SV: SV: how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policyproposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
-
From: =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=B8rgen_Hovland?= <>
-
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:36:45 +0200
-
Organization: =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=B8rgen_Hovland_ENK?=
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost [ ] På vegne av Jon Lawrence
>While I understand and accept your argument here, whether we'd ever run out >of
>address space imho has nothing to do with /48's. How many /32's have we got
>to play with ( 536870912 per /3 by my calculations) OK, that's still a big
>number. But if we allow everyone who wants to multihome a /32, there is the
>possibility that we could run out - not in the near future that's for sure.
FYI: There are LIRs with larger prefixes than /32 (/19, /20, /23++) because they argued that 65536 /48s wasn't enough. Expect more of these larger allocations.
Cheers,
Joergen Hovland ENK
|
|
|
|
