Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
-
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <>
-
From: Alexander Koch <>
-
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:34:08 +0100
-
Cc: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <>,
-
Organization: Tiscali International Network B.V.
On Thu, 24 March 2005 11:13:36 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > _and_ filter anything that is longer than that.
>
> That's what it says in the documents but then ARIN started to give out
> /48s so this policy doesn't work anymore. (Noboby bothered to change
> the documents that say it's ok to filter, though.)
Strongest argument so far. Besides the point that I agree
with the argument a /32 is probably oversized, be it v6 or
not.
Now that we have to take special care of the filters we
place anyway, why not do one approach, and that's pretty
much it.
> Also, for reasons of flap dampening exceptions and the like it's good
> to have these addresses in a single block.
Yes, excellent point, I agree with that for sure! I do not
want to think of some fancy BGP Flap Damping advisories that
gives me 7 /32 blocks I should not be damping or so. Argh.
Regards,
Alexander
--
Alexander Koch koch@localhost / ako4-ripe
Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464
|