Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root

[Nils Ketelsen <]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:38:50AM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 2-mrt-05, at 11:29, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> >Doing more-specific multihoming makes ONLY sense when planning to 
> >filter
> >them at some point in time. Unfortunately at exactly this point, this
> >scheme fails. This cannot be fixed in time and with education, this is
> >a very fundamental problem of this approach.
> No, it's not. Keeping the aggregate up isn't hard to do, and all the 
> other stuff is even easier.

I want a second uplink to another provider for one simple reason: I do not
trust one single provider to deliver the Level of service I want. 

Making a backup, that still relies on the first provider to work is only of
limited use. I want a backup, that also works if Provider1 loses all his
peers, burns down, goes bankrupt etc.

Nils
-- 
                      Will trade links for food.
                                                            [geklaut bei
                                                   www.userfriendly.org]