Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 addresses to transit-providers

[Alexander Koch <]

On Wed, 2 March 2005 11:32:26 +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[..]
> The question boils down to:
>  - do you require a entry in the routing table
> or:
>  - do you need address space
> 
> Giving a /32 to such a site would be quite some waste, as you will never
> use it.
> A /40 could be appropriate. But do you really need the entry in the
> routing table?

Cool. Then we as a transit provider have a problem. Well, we
have a handful of customers with /48 and some /64, but that are
not exactly that many... 80% of our v6 customers run BGP with
their /48 or /32...

Alexander