Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv4 assignment to resident user
-
To: Jaka Erjavec <>
-
From: Gert Doering <>
-
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:24:54 +0100
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=umPa6Lq56O5MVsRIz4Xdh+MO9Xl0JfAEX57mX9WjgRUhg0oGurkciYVe/JANkWIh ;
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:56:51AM +0100, Jaka Erjavec wrote:
> I was searching www.ripe.net website for a document where it says that
> IPv4 block can NOT be allocated to resident user (not company).
>
> Can you, guys, please point me to appropriate url?
First of all, a clarification:
* "allocated" means "given to a registry". An "allocation" is never given
to an end user (be it a company or a resident user). What a local registry
(LIR) gets from RIPE is an "allocation".
* Address blocks given to "end users" (of all sorts) are "assignments".
Then, to answer your question: there is no document that says "resident
users must not receive an IP address assignment". The reason for that
is: it is perfectly *valid* to give static IP address assignments to
end users - provided they provide appropriate documentation that they
will use it.
If a residential customer has 10 devices at home that all can speak IP, it
is *perfectly fine* (!!) to assign a /28 network to this customer.
RIPE does *not* mandate dynamic addressing or NAT. (But it is expected
that you think about it, before making a decision pro or contra NAT).
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
|