Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv4 assignment to resident user
-
From: Jaka Erjavec <>
-
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:31:07 +0100
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=OVoxvmZ02HgBg/98wnFKz5/nNo3Fi2Ys2d2PeZ1ig+R4xzWaa+HRJxxH8gvmK+OaPHE8VMfuI9WjW1Lh8b6Cbr8SQ3skPwxpr3ddO/N37so2cXK3CScQHjSjMIcPuTkJvaennIUqRVHv2qwlgy/CHOLJaaNu3VX9LO/VK8Dlz1k=
-
Reply-to: Jaka Erjavec <>
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:12:17 +0100, MarcoH marcoh@localhost wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:02:00AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 09:56 +0100, Jaka Erjavec wrote:
> > > Dear colleagues,
> > >
> > > I was searching www.ripe.net website for a document where it says that
> > > IPv4 block can NOT be allocated to resident user (not company).
> >
> > Allocations to endsites are afaik not possible, but assignments for sure
> > are.
>
> All the legal docs also talk about natural persons, so If you can buy
> enough PC's to justify the initial allocation and have the money and time
> to become an LIR I don't see big problems on getting your very own
> PA-allocation :)
Thank you all for these quick replys.
I used wrong term (allocation), when I meant assignment.
Jaka
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
