About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal

  • To: Denis Walker <
    >
  • From: Hank Nussbacher <
    >
  • Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 06:45:14 +0200 (IST)
  • Cc: Jørgen Hovland <
    >, leo vegoda <
    >, Gert Doering <
    >,

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Denis Walker wrote:

Yes, we (il.isoc) use it occasionally.  When we are revoking a customer's
ASN or IP range due to any number of reasons (failure to be multihomed,
for example), we will try email.  If that fails we try calling up the
phone number on record.  If that fails, we send registered snail mail to
the address on record.

Therefore, I do see value in retaining those fields.

-Hank

> Does anyone actually use the addresses and phone numbers from person
> objects? Or is all communication done these days by e-mail?
>
> The address and phone attributes are mandatory and e-mail is optional in
> a person object. Is this the wrong way round for the way the data is
> used today?




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community