Re: [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
-
To: Jørgen Hovland <>
-
From: Gert Doering <>
-
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:25:36 +0200
-
Cc: leo vegoda <>,
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=WnMmdl/rbOcOZu6tXvSEimtUIeURJXLc2mnuT9UNqgZT1/7HpIzkVSCmEQy6yHPo ;
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:58:58PM +0200, Jørgen Hovland wrote:
> So I can internally allocate 10 IPv6 addresses from our RIPE allocated /64,
> "IPv6 customer DSL pool", and give it to the private customer? I don't have
> to assign the customer itself a direct allocation?
You can't "assign" an "allocation".
Allocations are RIR->LIR, assignments LIR->Customer.
If you give IPv6 address space to customers, you're *doing* assignments,
and your company signed that you're going to do that according to policy
(which says "/128, /64, or /48 - no other choices permitted, unless a /48
is provable too small").
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
