Re: [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal

[Jørgen Hovland <]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gert Doering" gert@localhost

> > Our products may issue max N addresses per link from dhcp defined by the
> > product specifications.
> > Can I allocate 10 IPv6 addresses to a customer from our own pool, or does
> > the customer need its own record in the DB ? If so, _must_ this 
> > allocation
> > be a /64 even though the customer will only use 10 addresses?
> >
> > [ ] Yes.
> > [ ] No.
> > [ ] Don't know.
> The IPv6 end user assignment policies are pretty strict in that regard.
>
> There is no option to give "10 addresses" to a user - period.  When 
> becoming
> LIR, you've signed that you'll follow the RIPE policies - and this is
> established RIPE policy.
>
> So the whole question is moot.
I apologise if this is moot, but an answer would really be appreciated.
This becomes a problem with private users as it already is today. We can't 
store data about every single private user into a public database, and there 
might also be issues regarding the privacy act. It breaks the "true spirit 
of IPv6";  "have enough addresses, and no questions asked".

So basically we have a policy that is no or little different to the existing 
IPv4 policy, and private end-users can still only get one single address?
Or am I totally wrong? How can I give 10, and only 10, addresses to a 
private customer without allocating the customer its own /64 ?


Joergen Hovland