Archive: address-policy-wg@ripe.net/2005

All Archives / address-policy-wg / 2005 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• AW: [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
  • Bonness, Olaf (06 December 2005)
• Re: end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
  • Oliver Bartels (05 April 2005)
• end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gammaIPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
  • Pekka Savola (05 April 2005)
  • Randy Bush (05 April 2005)
• Re: how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
  • Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet (06 April 2005)
• Re: how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
  • Oliver Bartels (05 April 2005)
  • Randy Bush (06 April 2005)
  • Oliver Bartels (06 April 2005)
  • Oliver Bartels (06 April 2005)
  • Elmar K. Bins (06 April 2005)
  • Oliver Bartels (06 April 2005)
  • Elmar K. Bins (06 April 2005)
  • Florian Weimer (06 April 2005)
  • Florian Weimer (06 April 2005)
  • Iljitsch van Beijnum (06 April 2005)
  • Iljitsch van Beijnum (06 April 2005)
  • Iljitsch van Beijnum (06 April 2005)
  • Randy Bush (06 April 2005)
  • Florian Weimer (06 April 2005)
  • Jørgen Hovland (06 April 2005)
  • Randy Bush (06 April 2005)
  • Iljitsch van Beijnum (06 April 2005)
  • Sascha Luck (07 April 2005)
  • Gert Doering (07 April 2005)
  • Jon Lawrence (07 April 2005)
  • Michael Hallgren (07 April 2005)
• Re: how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gammaIPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
  • Michael.Dillon (06 April 2005)
  • Michael.Dillon (06 April 2005)
  • Michael.Dillon (06 April 2005)
• how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal:#gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
  • Pekka Savola (05 April 2005)
• Re: how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policyproposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
  • Pekka Savola (06 April 2005)
  • Jørgen Hovland (06 April 2005)
  • Pekka Savola (06 April 2005)
  • Pekka Savola (06 April 2005)
  • Pekka Savola (06 April 2005)
  • =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=B8rgen_Hovland?= (07 April 2005)
  • =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=B8rgen_Hovland?= (08 April 2005)
  • Michael.Dillon (08 April 2005)
  • =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=B8rgen_Hovland?= (08 April 2005)
• Limitting based on IP address is not useful (Was: Re: SV: how 200/48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6Initial Allocation Criteria])
  • Jeroen Massar (07 April 2005)
• What you miss in IPv6.... (Was: Re: Fw: how 200 /48's fails thejob [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria])
  • Jeroen Massar (07 April 2005)