Re: [address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation

[Sebastian Abt <]

Hi *,

* Gert Doering gert@localhost wrote:

> I like that.

Me too.

> > A range of IP's can only have a single "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" in it. 
> > That is, you cannot sub-allocate twice.
> 
> I wouldn't force that on anyone.  It might not always make sense, but
> we have at least one reseller that has a re-selling customer - so a 
> two-level structure is already in place.
> 
> So "please don't do that".

I disagree. Your customer should request a seperate "SUB-ALLOCATED PA"
block for his customer or otherwise if he want's to look like being
independent to his customer, he should become RIPE member. I hardly
can't see advantages of making sub-sub-allocations (maybe you could
point them out?).

regards,
 sebastian

-- 
whois: sabt-ripe - phone: +49 (0)174 3420738 
email: sabt@localhost - pgp-pubkey: 0x3B046B48