About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recentdiscussions

  • To: Gert Doering < >
  • From: Berislav Todorovic < >
  • Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:59:34 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer < >
    leo vegoda < >
    Address Policy WG < >

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gert Doering wrote:

>> That's an operational problem, not a technical one.
>> If IANA/ICANN isn't working, give them a good beating, but please don't
>> break policy to cover for human deficiencies.

Well, the policies should created for humans that deal with machines,
not for machines that have to deal with humans.

Renumbering Google means a change of an A (or CNAME) record. And
people can still use Altavista or Lycos, so no big deal.

Renumbering a ccTLD DNS is painful - even a secondary one. Not to
mention what happens to the primary, if the operator providing
connectivity to the registry bankrupts. Remember the ns.EU.net case?

And what about public exchange points?

Regards,
Beri

----------------------------------------------------------
               Berislav Todorovic, Designer
     KPN Telecom B.V. - OER IP Design and Engineering
   Phone: +31 70 343 1950  *  Email: beri@localhost
----------------------------------------------------------








  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community