[mat-wg] New feature from stat / ris - route-flap-dampening analysis
-
To: mat-wg@localhost
-
From: Harald Michl <harald.michl@localhost
-
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:14:50 +0200
-
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=univie.ac.at; s=rev2; h=Mime-Version:To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:From; bh=zpcqQ3jZ+iaGuWV7XqXEFMIgpwf/UZefF5Hkcn6XzK0=; b=i4cYPdCHoSNJdufxUM5YMmqJlJSsIO8abbahRTgjdIAFhqzDgXm2A3zMWDPM/Wmt36gvzHGv6iPTzXUqS2CcxTGyJjbAiF/3irrR3PxOX2av8bkfov9q7cKCW6raa59RNHFxtTsWVJTvC8OkZyePufurywCSCsHq7WfAY8JMlf8=;
Hi,
I had an idea today morning of what would really interest me:
Yesterday there was a short discussion if route-flap-dampening is good or bad
or ... If I intend to implement route-flap-dampening it would be nice, if I
would be able to know in advance, how my configuration of route-flap dampening
would have acted in the past. So:
- Enter a prefix
- enter parameters for route-flap-dampening
- press start
Then RIS makes an analysis of the "bgp-history" of the prefix and gets as
result if and from when to when your prefix would have been dampened according
to the parameters of flap-dampening you entered at start.
So you get the probability to play around _before_ eventually configuring
route-flap-dampening.
Would that be useful?
regards,
Harald
--
Harald Michl <harald.michl@localhost
Vienna University - ACOnet www.ACO.net - VIX www.VIX.at
Universitaetsstrasse 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe
Tel: +43 1 4277 - 14078 (Fax: - 9140) HM3550-RIPE
