RE: TTM as a regular service
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 12:11:33 +0200 (CEST)
Mike,
> 1. The way in which membership (section 2.3) is handled is
> simple and straightforward. However, at current levels of LIR-service
> fees, it's not equitable; a 'small' LIR taking TTM service gets bumped
> up two levels to 'large', but a 'large' LIR gets no benefit at all.
> It would be slightly fairer if TTM service moved you up one category,
> though still unfair to 'large' LIRs. Perhaps this needs to be looked
> at in the overall context of categories and charges for **all** services.
Yes, I see your point, I'll take this up with Axel and the board.
> 2. The service contract needs to be carefully worded especially
> when it comes to disclosure of results. The views of RIPE NCC and
> of the service community need to be reflected, and protected, here.
Absolutely.
After I sent out my previous mail, I got a first draft from our lawyers
that include a paragraph that seems to accomplish this. I'm a bit
reluctant to already put the draft on the net though, as it is really a
first draft that definitely needs a round of editting.
Henk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal@localhost
RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk
Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.535-4414, Fax -4445
1016 AB Amsterdam Home: +31.20.4195305
The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A man can take a train and never reach his destination.
(Kerouac, well before RFC2780).
