[ifwp] Re: request for clarification [2]

-----Original Message-----
From: cgomes at internic.net <cgomes at internic.net>
To: IFWP Discussion List <list at ifwp.org>
Date: Friday, September 11, 1998 7:36 AM
Subject: [ifwp] Re: request for clarification [2]


>Let me point out again what Don Telage clarified yesterday,
>NSI did not refuse to participate in either meeting.
>
>Chuck Gomes
>


Chuck,

Do you think it would be worthwhile for NSI
to attend the smaller meeting that people are
planning for next weekend ?

Have any of the other members of the legacy
Root Name Server Confederation (RSC) been
involved in the talks between NSI and IANA ?

>1. A - Network Solutions, Inc. (A)
>2. B - University of Southern California (ISI2)
>3. C - Performance Systems International Inc. (C-NYSER)
>4. D - University of Maryland (UMD-TERP)
>5. E - NASA Ames Research Center (NS-NASA)
>6. F - Internet Software Consortium (ISC)
>7. G - DOD Network Information Center (DIIS-NS)
>8. H - Army Research Laboratory (B)
>9. I - [No name] (NORDU) (Sweden)
>10. J - Network Solutions, Inc. (J)
>11. K - European Regional Internet Registry/RIPE NCC (K)
>12. L - University of Southern California (L)
>13. M - WIDE Project (M) (JAPAN)

Is there any chance that some of the above groups
could be represented ?

Maybe USC/ISI could send people from http://www.east.isi.edu

What about all of the U.S. Government agencies ?
How do you see them fitting into this picture starting
next month ?

What about RIPE ? They have historically been an
organization focused on IPv4 address resources,
recently they have become very active in TLD
administration. Since they apparently control the
"K" server above, how do you see them represented
in these discussions ?


Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.com
End-2-End: VPC(Java)---C+ at ---<IPv8>---C+ at ---(Java)VPC
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://www.ddj.com/index/author/idx10133.htm







-------- Logged at  Mon Sep 14 11:02:10 MET DST 1998  ---------