Re: [spoofing-tf] Preparing for anti-spoofing project at $fooBig carrier

  • To: "Pekka Savola" pekkas@localhost
  • From: "Martin Hannigan" hannigan@localhost
  • Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:23:31 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IqrLmIcsv4j6DGwPO7y/VOfzrd0ZIA5UDnIYqk28Cz3OGsLF2avcdex6A0wnDrpAJK11Fx8B98tfcM2ywJKz+4C2uektG3z4amTAq8uJPLQWE0fJFESsDkKsb1bl+qiwNZXy+ixqqRSWXi6EeEY38BD/ur89zTRRlkRg/ZC4iA4=

On 10/17/06, Pekka Savola pekkas@localhost wrote:

> 4. Anyone have any problem using this page as a reference for the
> implementation
>  reference as well as the BCP?
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/iacl.html

Infrastructure protection ACLs is just a subset of spoofing
protection.


This may be better.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/security/docs/urpf.pdf

Thanks,

-M<