You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > RIPE Mailing Lists > The rpslng Archives > Status of RPSLng

Status of RPSLng

Previous message: [Rps] Re: Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG...]

Next message: Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG (was Re: [Rps] Re: Latest RPSLng draft)]

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Tim Streater tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Thu Jan 29 16:03:17 CET 2004

Dear All,

I just recently joined this list. At DANTE we are interested in putting our v6 policy into our autnum object. Knowing there was some effort under way to make this possible, I looked at recent mails on this list and at draft-blunk-rpslng-02. As far as I can tell, we have inet6num supported in production, but everything else is under test or still under discussion. Is there some sort of roadmap or even rough estimate when everything will move into production? We are keen to start generating route filters as we do for v4.

Thanks,
--

Tim

Previous message: [Rps] Re: Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG...]

Next message: Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG (was Re: [Rps] Re: Latest RPSLng draft)]

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ rpslng Archives ]