[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Mon May 10 09:42:44 CEST 2010
Joao, On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:32 +0200, João Damas wrote: > > i can see an isp refusing to route a multi-homed content site because > > ripe docco 666 says no prefix longer than /36. > > > > that's why a number, any prefix length, would be wrong, imho and one should stick to the principles and give people an idea of costs of the options (to everyone). Basically create an atmosphere that makes normal people feel this is not a decision without impact. Perhaps people should be encouraged to search recent routing-wg archives for latest discussions, or to ask the working group for recommendations if there are none that seem to apply? -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]