[routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): Subject: [routing-wg]routing wg draft agenda v2 for RIPE 52
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Huston
gih at apnic.net
Sat Apr 29 17:04:17 CEST 2006
At 08:39 PM 29/04/2006, Philip Smith wrote: >Hi Rob, > >Rob Evans said the following on 29/4/06 01:33: > > > > I think this is a good document. > >Thank you. > > > Other presentations this week have shown a small number of prefixes > > contribute the majority of updates to the BGP table. If route flap > > damping in its current form isn't the answer to this, what is? Is > > education sufficient? Do we need an "Update Police"? > >Well, education is one aspect, but those of us who are trying to do the >education find that it is an uphill struggle against complacency and >"I'm all right, mate" attitudes. > >As for an Update Police, I can advertise Geoff's excellent site at >bgpupdates.potaroo.net - but I'm sure a weekly "BGP Update Report" mail >shot like the CIDR Report could be interesting, make such update >incidents a lot more visible, and help in the educational process. its coming very soon Geoff
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): Subject: [routing-wg]routing wg draft agenda v2 for RIPE 52
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]