[routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Apr 28 19:24:28 CEST 2006
> Other presentations this week have shown a small number of prefixes > contribute the majority of updates to the BGP table. If route flap > damping in its current form isn't the answer to this, what is? Is > education sufficient? Do we need an "Update Police"? i suggested that the rfd spec be modified, at least to be per-prefix as opposed to prefix+path, to allow the disaster prefixes to be easily detected and damped. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]