Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Aug 15 01:54:57 CEST 2005
> I would like to create "simple" tool for IP->AS mapping based on riswhois > data. i do not believe whois data have anything about as numbers > Would you suggest some "safe to ignore" margin for number of rispeers? so, you're looking at routing data (!=whois). the problem is that some of the ris peers o send all routes they know: internal, customer, peers, upstreams o send all internal and customer o send all customer o ... so you're in for a complex and fun game on the path you're suggesting randy
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]