[ris-int] Re: Fwd: 220.127.116.11 - 18.104.22.168 "RIPE NCC Route Flap Dampening,and BGP Beacon Studies"
Fri Feb 4 15:28:44 CET 2005
> I think we should delete those entries. > > A. The guy seems to be asking for *adding* objects for the *old* beacon prefixes to the RIPE DB: >> >Hi Henk >> > >> >Could you please update the RIPE database with a valide ROUTE-Object for >> >the network: >> > >> >22.214.171.124/24 since at least Fri Feb 13 01:47:26 2004 >> >126.96.36.199/24 since at least Fri Feb 13 01:47:26 2004 >> > >> >Cheers >> > >> >M. However, as they are no longer announced, I'd say it's ok for those route objects to not be there. If the old address space has been returned to hostmasters, the old inetnum objects perhaps should be deleted too. But it's been toooo long ago since I had the LIR training course to know the details :-) -- Rene
[ Ris-int Archive ]