<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [ripe-pdp] Current policy process
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
> have you looked at arin or recent apnic process documents? > i suggest we model after them. yes, I have studied them and find two points for discussion: http://www.arin.net/policy/ipep.html - RIPE does not have an advisory council. -- Should we make a new such - or should we re-use a subset of the working group chairs (sort of like the IETF IESG style) - in the Arin process the board of trustees has an active part in reviewing the policy and adopts or rejects the policy. -- do we want this in the RIPE community too or do we - want the board to have a more remote role ? (Such as returing to the policy process if process is not followed) Hans Petter
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ripe-pdp] Current policy process
- From: Randy Bush
- Re: [ripe-pdp] Current policy process
- References:
- Re: [ripe-pdp] Current policy process
- From: Randy Bush
- Re: [ripe-pdp] Current policy process
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |