Re: [ripe-pdp] Current policy process
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
> have you looked at arin or recent apnic process documents?
> i suggest we model after them.
yes, I have studied them and find two points for discussion:
- RIPE does not have an advisory council.
-- Should we make a new such - or should we re-use a subset of the working
group chairs (sort of like the IETF IESG style)
- in the Arin process the board of trustees has an active part in
reviewing the policy and adopts or rejects the policy.
-- do we want this in the RIPE community too or do we - want the board to
have a more remote role ? (Such as returing to the policy process if
process is not followed)