Re: Open letter

• To: Peter Lothberg < >
• From: Jon Crowcroft < >
• Date: Wed, 23 Sep 92 07:27:41 +0100
• Cc:

 >> The whole issue is of course to maintain reasonalbe full control of
 >> routing and mangement so that any migration to IPv7, CIDER TUBA etc
 >> MAY be possible.
 >IPv7 is CLNP on the 'internetworking' layer, no magic, and it still
 >have some of the old source/dest limitation's, even thus it might do
 >some good. (Personally I think we need another kind of toy here)

IPv7 may be CLNP or PIP or IPAE or other...it is NOT decided til at
earliest next ietf...

 >There is somthing more, routing of troble-tickets, with todays
 >international cooperation among all the actors (maybe not EMPB) we can
 >receive a user complain't and get it resolved , even if it crosses
 >*MANY* operators/networks.

agree definitely!!!

 jon

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • Re: Open letter
    • From: Peter Lothberg