[atlas] Selecting only anchors for UDM
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Selecting only anchors for UDM
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Selecting only anchors for UDM
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jun 11 21:50:04 CEST 2014
Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 04:09:02PM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > My *personal* straw-man for IPV6WORKS would be "At least 3 IPv6 targets > pinged successfully in the past 24 hours". IPv6 targets should be > high-availability built-in measurement targets such as anchors and root > name servers. The number and time interval can be discussed. "works for me". The Internet being what it is, "can reach all of <x>" will most likely never be true for a given probe, whatever <x> is. OTOH for reachability testing, probes that can *not* reach 100% of <x> but at least "some part of <x>" are a much more interesting candidate for testing - because testing when you already know "100%, good" is a bit boring. So, yes, what Daniel proposed. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20140611/f20d9066/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Selecting only anchors for UDM
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Selecting only anchors for UDM
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]