[atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen van der Ham
jeroen at dckd.nl
Sun Sep 15 13:03:56 CEST 2013
On 15 Sep 2013, at 04:16, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > hypothesis: atlas probes show a bias toward clueful locations. unless > there is a calibration set with a different, or better yet known, bias, > what useful is actually being measured? unless it's a name and shame > game. and then you will want to know if things 'improve' over time, > which means it is not a one-shot. Even clueful individuals have broadband connections at home, creating a network over which they do not have much control. Especially those networks are of interest regarding the (non-)filtering of spoofed packets. Jeroen. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 275 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20130915/cb1a936b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]