[atlas] probe allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gilles Massen
gilles.massen at restena.lu
Thu Nov 14 17:47:28 CET 2013
On 11/14/2013 10:19 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > With hindsight(!) this shows that adding and removing probes in > existing measurements was probably not such a good design choice, > although I supported it in order to allow repleneshing the probe pool > of long-running measurements. >From a simple user point of view I have mixed feelings toward that feature: on one hand it would prevent long running measurements from decaying, on the other hand if you run (multiple) measurements on a specific set of probes you might not want them to drift apart. Gilles -- Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU 6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg tel: (+352) 424409 fax: (+352) 422473
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]