[atlas]is this correct
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]is this correct
- Next message (by thread): [atlas]is this correct
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bert (IETF) Wijnen
bertietf at bwijnen.net
Wed Nov 10 11:14:56 CET 2010
Adreas, it looks a bit better now. But at the bottom of my list I still see a lot of duplicates. I am also wondering if it would be better to sort then in reverse chronological order. Now it looks as if there is no (obvious) sorting sequence. Bert On 11/10/10 5:57 PM, Andreas Strikos wrote: > Fixed, > > we had on little exception somewhere but now everything back to normal > > /Andreas > On Nov 10, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Andreas Strikos wrote: > >> Hi Bert, >> >> it's definitely not correct. I am trying to find out what went wrong there for your probe and i'll will let you know >> >> /Andreas >> On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote: >> >>> looking at "Last 25 connections", I vaguely suspect that this >>> is somehow not correct (at least not what I expected) >>> >>> Bert >>> >>> *Current status:* <green_check2.jpg> Up since 2010-11-09 19:23:06 UTC >>> *Total Uptime:* 20d, 17h, 7m >>> >>> <plus.png>Show last 25 connections >>> <minus.png>Hide last 25 connections >>> >>> *Connect at:* *Disconnect at:* >>> 2010-11-09 19:23:06 UTC (still connected) >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> 2010-11-05 09:53:28 UTC 2010-11-05 21:53:31 UTC >>> >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20101110/871c9a77/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]is this correct
- Next message (by thread): [atlas]is this correct
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]