Re: Changes to PI Policy?
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:59:10 +0200
Gert,
was only a suggestion....
Let's say RIPE assigns 300x /24 to customers requesting PI, they could as well assign 300x /29 and this would always create 300 more routes in the Internet, not more; and saving address-space.
Andr�
At 17:54 22.04.2003 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 05:52:59PM +0200, Andre Chapuis wrote:
>> We could also agree to start accepting smaller networks within a given range RIPE would make PI assignments within.
>> eg: accept up to /29 within 193/8.
>
>We (SpaceNet) won't ever accept anything more specific than a /24. Period.
>
>There is no sense in having a globally visible "small network", except
>for root name servers (and they are well-known).
>
>Gert Doering
> -- NetMaster
>--
>Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 58512 (58485)
>
>SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
>Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
>80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
---------------------
Andre Chapuis
IP+ Engineering
Swisscom Ltd
Genfergasse 14
3050 Bern
+41 31 893 89 61
chapuis@localhost
CCIE #6023
----------------------
