<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: Changes to PI Policy?
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:09:43 +0100
At 18:18 17/04/2003 +0200, leo vegoda wrote:
Not immediately, we would have to solve the routing problem first. But in the longer term, I think that it would be a desirable goal.The solution has to be to look at it from the other perspective and make everyone provider independent. In the interim, I think we should just look at stretching out the current address space so it supports legitimate uses and predicted capacity requirements.I want to check I understand what you suggest here. Do you mean that the PA -vs- PI distinction should be removed? i.e. all IPv4 address space would become portable?
peter
--
peter gradwell. gradwell dot com Ltd. http://www.gradwell.com/
engineering & hosting services for email, web and usenet
- Post To The List:
- References:
- Re: Changes to PI Policy?
- From: Peter Gradwell
- Re: Changes to PI Policy?
- From: Peter Gradwell
- Changes to PI Policy?
- From: leo vegoda
- Re: Changes to PI Policy?
- From: leo vegoda
- Re: Changes to PI Policy?
- From: leo vegoda
- Re: Changes to PI Policy?
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |