hostcount features [Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE50 - NCC Services WG Draft Minutes]
- Previous message (by thread): hostcount features [Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE50 - NCC Services WG Draft Minutes]
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Fwd: Final Deadline - 2005 RIPE NCC Membership Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Jun 30 21:06:23 CEST 2005
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Pavel Vachek wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear Peter, > you wrote: > > > First, it's never complete, so you only find those organisations who both > > happen to use the wrong IP addresses and are within your TLD, while > > nothing prevents them from using COM, BIZ or XXX {filter food} names as well. > > You are perfectly right. I have been using only the `.cz' > hostcount TLD raw data and no other TLD data because I thought > that this was the most common kind of misuse here. I only access the .il hostcount raw data and have only a need to access that particular cctld and am willing to be either technically or administratively limited that cctld. -Hank > > > Second, and more important, this kind of policing, although it has been done > > for years, might reduce the willingness of affected and other parties to > > allow AXFR access. Experience shows that many organisations have only and > > explicitly granted AXFR access to support the hostcount statistics data > > collection (and some DNS quality postprocessing). So, declaring "raw data > > access" a feature of the hostcount is detrimental to its success. It was a > > side effect that's gone. > > Noone from our TLD has ever complained about my access to the > hostcount data. If they did not like it, they probably just > inhibited the AXFR access to their domains. > > > -Peter > > > > PS: Just to be clear: the DE hostcount raw data must not be published. > > I had never even looked at it. Whan I was signing the > Hostcount AUP statement I had explicitly written that I was > interested only in the `.cz' TLD data. > > Best regards, > Pavel Vachek, CESNET NIC, Prague. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ > > iD8DBQFCxCE7Prynl47KNS4RApkFAKCSJVv2I9XqDvHXM8nmpAsH9H5EDACglI7B > IAVhKETXRk01V0wFvV989EQ= > =JoNT > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System > at the Tel-Aviv University CC. >
- Previous message (by thread): hostcount features [Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE50 - NCC Services WG Draft Minutes]
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Fwd: Final Deadline - 2005 RIPE NCC Membership Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]