[members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Mangin
thomas.mangin at exa-networks.co.uk
Tue Jul 24 20:22:51 CEST 2012
> Andrea, in the previous round of discussions we said why we can't use an > "n euros per address model". > > To re-iterate the argument, if we are seen to be "selling" IP addresses > by the Dutch tax authorities then we lose our special tax status. This > will immediately cause a rise in the cost of running the RIPE as we will > be liable for Dutch corporation tax. Up until now the membership hasn't > wanted this. Could RIPE look change its jurisdiction ? was it ever considered ? Large organisation (and RIPE could be seen in that way) tend to move to the country providing them the best operational advantages, including taxes. Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]