[members-discuss] Executive Board Activity Since the RIPE NCC General Meeting
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Activity Since the RIPE NCC General Meeting
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jochem de Ruig
jochem at ripe.net
Thu Dec 22 10:30:54 CET 2011
Hi Florian, There has not been a firm rule, this has been a manual process, looking at internal records, archives ( ERX transfer web page, InterNIC/ARIN legacy records, etc ) and comparing those different data sets. In case of doubt further investigation was done on case per case basis. Regards, Jochem On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jochem de Ruig: > >> There is no 100% conclusive way to see in the RIPE Database whether >> prefixes are legacy space under this waiver. There are some ways to >> see/deduct it in the RIPE Database but that is not complete nor >> conclusive as the status of these objects has changed many times over >> the years. > > Jochem, > > thanks for the explanation. What's the precise rule, then? > Does it apply to resources which have been traded and then > converted to PI status? > > Florian > -- > Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> > BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ > Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 > D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1735 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20111222/2a038e01/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Activity Since the RIPE NCC General Meeting
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]