| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:20:14 +0200
Well, the entire idea was to filter at /48s. If you filter on shorter prefixes, the idea fails. Simple.- If the primary ISP (the one that announces the /32) dies. The site is
dead as well. This is the #1 reason why organizations do multihome:
they
want to be up even if their primary ISP tanks.
You mean if /48s where filtered? So don't filter ;-) That was the original idea with the proposal...You mean, ask google.com upstream provider to not filter you ? Or your provider's provider to not filter google ? :)
- kurtis -
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
- Post To The List:
- References:
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Carlos Morgado
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
