Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:30:08 +0200
[ ] continue the IANA->RIR->LIR allocation as it is now
No.
[ ] accept RIPE-261
Yes.
[ ] allocate bigger chunks IANA->RIR (/8 ?) and inside those chunks,
use a binary chop algorithm similar to the one described in
RIPE-261
Yes.
[ ] go for a full multi-level regional distribution, down to
"one /32 per LIR per country" (as detailed by Michael Py)
No.
I do like a good rant as much as anybody else, but "BGP is broken" and
"you don't understand the way the Internet will work in 10 years" will
not
really help us *get there*. So please try to confine the discussion to
this topic, and try to get consensus how to move on.
Agreed. The flaws of IPv6 comes down to not solving the
multihomign/routing scaling/world starvation problem. That is an IETF
problem, and there is a WG for it. (Ok, so I took the opportunity to
do some marketing).
- kurtis -
