| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 17:46:53 +0200
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 05:03:32PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > As I've already replied to Daniel Roesen: if you're big enough, you might > need to carry even the far-distant more specifics. But then you need to > buy "the big routers" anyway, just due to interface speed reasons. No, more or less every BGP customer wants full routes. You assume that BGP customers with smallish bandwidths don't have a need for really _full_ routes. I think quite the contrary is true... the smaller the customer, the more he wants/needs to do traffic engineering. Best regards, daniel
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Gert Doering
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- References:
- RE: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Michel Py
- RE: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Hank Nussbacher
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Andre Oppermann
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Gert Doering
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Carlos Morgado
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Gert Doering
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Carlos Morgado
- Re: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Gert Doering
- RE: [lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
