| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [lir-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Discussion about RIPE-261
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 08:50:08 +0200
In other words, what we are looking at is one /32 prefix perActually what you are looking at is one /32 per LIR + one /32 per country per large LIR.
country per large LIR, opposed to as many /32s a large LIR would need in
the long run anyway.
Without tweaking routing, a more efficient way would be to use the fact that IPv6 blocks are a lot larger than IPv4 blocks and simply give one /32 to every LIR. I guess this would only work with RIPE who have the concepts of LIRs but anyway.
- kurtis -
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lir-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Måns Nilsson
- Re: [lir-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Discussion about RIPE-261
- References:
- [lir-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Discussion about RIPE-261
- From: Michel Py
- [lir-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Discussion about RIPE-261
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
