Re: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:58:39 +0100
here are a number of people
who will tell you that this won't scale and break a number of
applications.
Since I proposed it in April 2000, no one told me that this won't
scale.
That surprises me. Then again I wasn't aware of you draft until you
mailed it here. What WG do see this under? I will comment to multi6
anyway...
There already is running code of of 8+8, transport over it, such
as TCP, and applications over it, such as TCP multihomed telephony
with no address reselection latency, that there is not much work
remaning.
Never mention poor GSE. It is a poor idea useless for any purpose.
Uh, what is the difference between 8+8 and GSE?
Current IPv6, in a sense, is 8+8 and was 10+6.
???? you mean the IID being 8 and the rest the other 8? I don't agree...
GSE is a poor variation of 8+8. GSE is poor because it is an attempt
to make ISP operation more complex (that is, less scalable), which
has been the tradition of telephone companies to maximize their
revenue.
I fail to see what GSE, 8+8 or anything have to do with telephone
companies.
- kurtis -
