<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself

  • To:
  • From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:07:57 +0100
  Sorry, Gert,

>> As Leo already explained: RIPE != RIPE NCC. I see the usefulness of
>> a /48 that travels along with the RIPE meetings. As far as I know,
>> this /48 always has the same upstream (the RIPE _NCC_ office) by
>> means of a v6-in-v4 tunnel. 
>
>And exactly this is the reason why I don't see the need for a second /48.

  I don't get your point here. What are you trying to salvage?
  1x /48 out of SURFnet's sTLA or 1x /48 out of the /42 or ??

  Wilfried.
  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>