<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself

  • To: Gert Doering < >
  • From: Ronald van der Pol < >
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:21:54 +0100
  • Cc: Ronald van der Pol < >
    leo vegoda < >
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 14:11:14 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:59:35PM +0100, Ronald van der Pol wrote:
> > BTW, I agree RIPE* is special. I can understand the need for separate
> > /48s for the RIPE NCC office and the RIPE meetings. 
> 
> Why?

As Leo already explained: RIPE != RIPE NCC. I see the usefulness of
a /48 that travels along with the RIPE meetings. As far as I know,
this /48 always has the same upstream (the RIPE _NCC_ office) by
means of a v6-in-v4 tunnel. When native v6 connectivity will be
widely available at meeting sites, this might change.

	rvdp
  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>