Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:37:24 +0100
Hi Ronald,
Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@localhost writes
>On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:12:27 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>> I tend to agree with you. The /42 has been sub-allocated from Surfnet
>> to the RIPE NCC (the NCC being "Just any Surfnet customer" here, not
>> acting in their function as RIR).
>
>But RIPE NCC as RIR did approve it according to 5.4.2 of ripe-246.
>How many hats does RIPE NCC have in this case :-)
This is not the case. Each assignment has been made to a separate
organisation. There is a single assignment for the RIPE NCC. There is a
separate assignment for the RIPE meeting. RIPE is not the same as the
RIPE NCC.
Similarly, assignments made to employees' home networks are to separate
End Users and not the RIPE NCC.
Each assignment within the allocation is to a separate End Site.
Regards,
--
leo vegoda
RIPE NCC
Registration Services
