| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:38:40 +0100
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:12:27 +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > I tend to agree with you. The /42 has been sub-allocated from Surfnet > to the RIPE NCC (the NCC being "Just any Surfnet customer" here, not > acting in their function as RIR). But RIPE NCC as RIR did approve it according to 5.4.2 of ripe-246. How many hats does RIPE NCC have in this case :-) rvdp
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- From: leo vegoda
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- References:
- [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- From: Robert Kiessling
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- From: Gert Doering
- [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
