RE: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

• To:
• From:
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:51:02 -0000

we have 'inet6num' objects separate to 'inetnum' to distinguish IPv6 address
assignments from IPv4.

Is the question should different 'peering-set' 'route' objects etc reflect
different peerings for IPv6 from IPv4 that an assigned AS can have? This
scenario is real as I can easily give a current (enterprise LIR) example.

Regards,

Adrian F Pauling
BT Ignite Solutions 

• Post To The List:

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [db-wg] RE: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?
    • From: Shane Kerr