| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:17:06 +0100
- Organization: Gitoyen
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Gert Doering gert@localhost wrote a message of 44 lines which said: > But the IETF in their infinite wisdom decided that this is not what > people will want, so you're supposed to give them a /48. Which, for RFC 3177 explains in great detail the rationale behind this recommendation. I suggest to read it.
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- From: Gert Doering
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- References:
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- From: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
- RE: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- From: Jeroen Massar
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
- From: Gert Doering
- Re: [lir-wg] IPv6 assignments to RIPE itself
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
