RE: [lir-wg] ripe allocation 82.0.0.0/8 and arin allocation 69.0.0.0/8
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:25:35 +0100
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, leo vegoda wrote:
>
> > The RIPE NCC can not guarantee whether any particular route will
> > be accepted by any network operator.
Which seems fairly reasonable to me.
>
> Thats a problem. Question - if one of your customers discovers that an
> allocation does not route can they have it replaced with one that does.
>
Better fix the real problem than escape it? I'd guess main cause of problem
being lack of understanding, so propagate know-how to concerned parties
rather
than provide quick fix.
> I understand you don't guarantee any particular allocation will route.
> And in the old days when the charges were minimal for IP allocation - well
> one could reluctantly accept that. However - under the new policies you
> boys are charging these people hefty bucks and that means liability and I
> don't think it prudent to hide behind the routing claim. I have
> documented over 15 cases in which the 69.0.0.0/8 fiasco has cost these
> people clients and business that went elsewhere.
Hrm,... charging for what??
<snip />
mh
