<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

  • To: Robert Kiessling < >
  • From: Nigel Titley < >
  • Date: 12 Jun 2002 13:55:22 +0000
  • Cc: 
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 13:17, Robert Kiessling wrote:
> Nigel Titley nigel@localhost writes:
> 
> > > This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone
> > 
> > Don't you mean assignments? :-)
> 
> No.
> 
> > > who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").
> > 
> > Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)
> 
> 5.3 of the 2002-04-25 draft: "LIR-to-ISP allocation". LIRs are free to
> suballocate the allocation they got from a RIR. Such a suballocation
> is neither an assignment nor a RIR-allocation, so should get a
> separate status attribute (as found in the original proposal).

Apologies. I forgot the thread originated in an IPv6 context, and since
then it has ended up copied to the world and his wife. To which end I've
trimmed the Cc:

Nigel
  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>